+782.9%
ONDS vs TER
+207.3%
+575.6%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TER | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | +8.3% | -5.4% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +8.7% | +5.9% | +2.8% | +5.6% |
| 30D | -14.1% | -30.8% | +16.7% | +4.5% |
| 3M | -41.2% | -29.9% | -11.2% | -30.6% |
| 6M | -39.2% | -27.5% | -11.7% | -32.6% |
| YTD | -41.3% | +37.5% | -78.8% | -57.6% |
| 1Y | -1.2% | +50.3% | -51.5% | -32.6% |
| All | +782.9% | +207.3% | +575.6% | +306.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TER.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TER return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TER return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TER wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling