+750.4%
ONDS vs STZ
-50.2%
+800.6%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -5.6% | +5.6% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -7.4% | +15.6% | +8.8% |
| 30D | -16.4% | -10.9% | -5.5% | -15.7% |
| 3M | -26.0% | -13.4% | -12.6% | -25.3% |
| 6M | -22.5% | -16.2% | -6.3% | -21.6% |
| YTD | -21.9% | -10.4% | -11.5% | -22.8% |
| 1Y | +25.7% | -14.8% | +40.5% | +25.7% |
| All | +750.4% | -50.2% | +800.6% | +783.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling