+709.2%
ONDS vs NVO
-50.9%
+760.0%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.2% | +0.7% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -7.4% | +2.4% | -3.8% |
| 30D | -25.6% | -5.5% | -20.1% | -24.9% |
| 3M | -22.1% | +4.1% | -26.2% | -23.4% |
| 6M | -27.6% | +19.3% | -46.9% | -30.7% |
| YTD | -25.7% | -9.2% | -16.5% | -26.7% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -15.0% | +45.4% | +30.8% |
| All | +709.2% | -50.9% | +760.0% | +781.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling