+1,111.0%
ONDS vs NIO
-56.4%
+1,167.3%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.9% | +0.6% | +11.3% | +11.7% |
| 7D | +3.8% | +6.9% | -3.1% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -11.3% | -4.7% | -6.5% | -9.9% |
| 3M | -34.5% | -28.1% | -6.4% | -28.9% |
| 6M | -34.1% | -41.7% | +7.6% | -25.0% |
| YTD | -38.8% | -33.1% | -5.7% | -33.3% |
| 1Y | +2.8% | -50.3% | +53.0% | +20.1% |
| 3Y | +1,111.0% | -54.4% | +1,165.3% | +1,291.3% |
| All | +1,111.0% | -56.4% | +1,167.3% | +1,291.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling