+709.2%
ONDS vs MTB
+113.5%
+595.7%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +0.4% | -1.0% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -0.4% | -4.5% | -4.6% |
| 30D | -25.6% | -4.6% | -21.0% | -22.4% |
| 3M | -22.1% | +7.4% | -29.6% | -27.5% |
| 6M | -27.6% | +18.7% | -46.2% | -38.5% |
| YTD | -25.7% | +21.1% | -46.8% | -38.6% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +24.1% | +6.3% | +5.2% |
| All | +709.2% | +113.5% | +595.7% | +264.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling