+841.6%
ONDS vs MSTZ
-99.1%
+940.7%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +6.6% | -7.1% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +24.8% | -29.8% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -25.6% | -59.2% | +33.7% | -35.3% |
| 3M | -22.1% | -56.9% | +34.7% | -27.8% |
| 6M | -27.6% | -57.6% | +30.0% | -27.8% |
| YTD | -25.7% | -73.6% | +47.9% | -24.8% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -15.6% | +46.0% | +71.2% |
| All | +841.6% | -99.1% | +940.7% | +1,105.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling