+709.2%
ONDS vs MET
+66.1%
+643.0%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MET | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +1.1% | -1.7% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -2.5% | -2.5% | -3.0% |
| 30D | -25.6% | 0.0% | -25.5% | -25.6% |
| 3M | -22.1% | +13.1% | -35.2% | -31.3% |
| 6M | -27.6% | +39.0% | -66.6% | -48.1% |
| YTD | -25.7% | +25.2% | -50.9% | -41.5% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +25.6% | +4.8% | +3.6% |
| All | +709.2% | +66.1% | +643.0% | +299.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MET.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MET return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MET return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MET wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling