-42.9%
ONDS vs LSCC
-16.2%
-26.7%
-66.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +18.0% | +7.1% | +10.9% | +13.7% |
| 7D | -15.6% | +13.0% | -28.5% | -21.0% |
| 30D | -25.8% | -19.8% | -6.0% | -15.8% |
| 3M | -39.0% | -18.4% | -20.6% | -32.1% |
| 6M | -42.9% | -16.1% | -26.8% | -31.7% |
| All | -42.9% | -16.2% | -26.7% | -31.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling