+709.2%
ONDS vs LMT
+36.0%
+673.1%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +1.1% | -1.6% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -0.5% | -4.4% | -4.8% |
| 30D | -25.6% | -10.8% | -14.8% | -23.0% |
| 3M | -22.1% | +1.6% | -23.7% | -22.2% |
| 6M | -27.6% | -17.6% | -10.0% | -23.1% |
| YTD | -25.7% | +11.6% | -37.3% | -26.7% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +17.2% | +13.2% | +28.6% |
| All | +709.2% | +36.0% | +673.1% | +823.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling