+725.6%
ONDS vs LDOS
+39.7%
+685.9%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | +0.5% | -0.7% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -3.5% | -5.4% | +1.9% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -14.1% | +4.9% | -19.0% | -16.9% |
| 3M | -36.3% | +7.2% | -43.5% | -39.4% |
| 6M | -27.5% | -24.2% | -3.2% | -14.0% |
| YTD | -21.9% | -25.8% | +3.9% | -6.5% |
| 1Y | +43.0% | -24.7% | +67.7% | +71.6% |
| All | +725.6% | +39.7% | +685.9% | +493.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling