+782.9%
ONDS vs LDOS
+33.8%
+749.1%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | -2.4% | +5.3% | +4.1% |
| 7D | +8.7% | -1.3% | +10.0% | +9.2% |
| 30D | -14.1% | +10.1% | -24.2% | -19.2% |
| 3M | -41.2% | -4.7% | -36.5% | -40.4% |
| 6M | -39.2% | +5.6% | -44.7% | -41.8% |
| YTD | -41.3% | -25.1% | -16.2% | -31.2% |
| 1Y | -1.2% | -31.7% | +30.5% | +22.2% |
| All | +782.9% | +33.8% | +749.1% | +662.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling