+709.2%
ONDS vs IEMG
+81.5%
+627.7%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -2.0% | +1.5% | +2.9% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -0.9% | -4.1% | -3.7% |
| 30D | -25.6% | +2.1% | -27.7% | -28.4% |
| 3M | -22.1% | +4.6% | -26.7% | -27.7% |
| 6M | -27.6% | +14.0% | -41.6% | -42.4% |
| YTD | -25.7% | +22.3% | -48.1% | -48.6% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +30.7% | -0.3% | -19.0% |
| All | +709.2% | +81.5% | +627.7% | +131.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling