+709.2%
ONDS vs GM
+168.3%
+540.9%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +2.8% | -3.4% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -1.1% | -3.9% | -4.5% |
| 30D | -25.6% | -3.4% | -22.1% | -24.2% |
| 3M | -22.1% | +8.7% | -30.8% | -25.8% |
| 6M | -27.6% | +15.4% | -43.0% | -33.0% |
| YTD | -25.7% | +6.6% | -32.3% | -28.3% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +51.5% | -21.1% | +5.1% |
| All | +709.2% | +168.3% | +540.9% | +358.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling