+725.6%
ONDS vs GLDM
+128.8%
+596.8%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -0.9% | +0.8% | +0.4% |
| 7D | -3.5% | -0.5% | -3.0% | -3.1% |
| 30D | -14.1% | +4.4% | -18.5% | -15.7% |
| 3M | -36.3% | -1.1% | -35.3% | -35.9% |
| 6M | -27.5% | -13.7% | -13.8% | -23.5% |
| YTD | -21.9% | +2.8% | -24.7% | -19.7% |
| 1Y | +43.0% | +24.8% | +18.1% | +47.7% |
| All | +725.6% | +128.8% | +596.8% | +1,150.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling