+709.2%
ONDS vs FND
-50.8%
+759.9%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FND | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.5% | +0.9% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -5.1% | +0.1% | -2.6% |
| 30D | -25.6% | -22.5% | -3.0% | -15.7% |
| 3M | -22.1% | -5.0% | -17.1% | -22.4% |
| 6M | -27.6% | -21.5% | -6.0% | -20.6% |
| YTD | -25.7% | -23.0% | -2.7% | -19.1% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -44.9% | +75.3% | +71.1% |
| All | +709.2% | -50.8% | +759.9% | +773.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FND.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FND return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FND return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FND wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling