+782.9%
ONDS vs FLUT
-43.0%
+825.9%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLUT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | +3.6% | -0.7% | +2.4% |
| 7D | +8.7% | +4.5% | +4.2% | +8.0% |
| 30D | -14.1% | +9.2% | -23.3% | -15.5% |
| 3M | -41.2% | -13.7% | -27.5% | -40.0% |
| 6M | -39.2% | -9.0% | -30.2% | -39.6% |
| YTD | -41.3% | -60.2% | +19.0% | -29.3% |
| 1Y | -1.2% | -63.1% | +61.9% | +19.7% |
| All | +782.9% | -43.0% | +825.9% | +1,151.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLUT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLUT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLUT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLUT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling