+706.9%
ONDS vs FLNC
-62.9%
+769.8%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | +2.5% | -2.8% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -5.1% | -4.1% | -1.1% | -4.3% |
| 30D | -26.0% | -24.8% | -1.2% | -20.7% |
| 3M | -26.4% | -59.1% | +32.7% | -9.5% |
| 6M | -26.4% | -42.0% | +15.5% | -20.6% |
| YTD | -25.9% | -49.8% | +23.9% | -18.4% |
| 1Y | +12.6% | +43.1% | -30.5% | -6.7% |
| 3Y | +706.9% | -61.0% | +767.9% | +826.8% |
| All | +706.9% | -62.9% | +769.8% | +826.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling