+713.6%
ONDS vs FITB
+128.2%
+585.4%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.3% | -0.6% | -3.7% | -3.8% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -0.4% | -3.8% | -3.9% |
| 30D | -21.7% | -5.1% | -16.6% | -17.9% |
| 3M | -24.5% | +3.5% | -28.0% | -27.2% |
| 6M | -25.0% | +17.2% | -42.2% | -35.3% |
| YTD | -25.3% | +17.6% | -42.9% | -36.6% |
| 1Y | +33.8% | +23.4% | +10.4% | +8.6% |
| All | +713.6% | +128.2% | +585.4% | +239.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling