+709.2%
ONDS vs ENTG
+42.3%
+666.8%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ENTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -3.9% | +3.4% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +5.1% | -10.1% | -7.7% |
| 30D | -25.6% | -8.5% | -17.0% | -22.5% |
| 3M | -22.1% | +6.7% | -28.8% | -27.7% |
| 6M | -27.6% | +17.7% | -45.3% | -38.0% |
| YTD | -25.7% | +63.5% | -89.2% | -48.7% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +73.6% | -43.2% | -11.6% |
| All | +709.2% | +42.3% | +666.8% | +367.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling