+709.2%
ONDS vs CLSK
+191.6%
+517.6%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -3.6% | +3.1% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +1.7% | -6.7% | -5.7% |
| 30D | -25.6% | +11.1% | -36.7% | -28.8% |
| 3M | -22.1% | -14.1% | -8.0% | -18.9% |
| 6M | -27.6% | +32.9% | -60.5% | -35.4% |
| YTD | -25.7% | +26.5% | -52.2% | -32.5% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | +27.6% | +2.8% | +18.8% |
| All | +709.2% | +191.6% | +517.6% | +126.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling