+709.2%
ONDS vs BLDR
-58.1%
+767.2%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -3.9% | +3.4% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -8.1% | +3.1% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -25.6% | -21.5% | -4.1% | -17.2% |
| 3M | -22.1% | -21.0% | -1.2% | -15.0% |
| 6M | -27.6% | -37.1% | +9.5% | -12.3% |
| YTD | -25.7% | -42.7% | +17.0% | -7.3% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -58.0% | +88.3% | +89.9% |
| All | +709.2% | -58.1% | +767.2% | +871.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling