+709.2%
ONDS vs AZO
+10.2%
+698.9%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.0% | +0.5% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -2.9% | -2.1% | -5.0% |
| 30D | -25.6% | -5.3% | -20.3% | -25.5% |
| 3M | -22.1% | -7.3% | -14.8% | -22.0% |
| 6M | -27.6% | -22.7% | -4.9% | -25.4% |
| YTD | -25.7% | -15.0% | -10.7% | -24.5% |
| 1Y | +30.4% | -32.2% | +62.6% | +40.9% |
| All | +709.2% | +10.2% | +698.9% | +534.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling