+782.9%
ONDS vs ALHC
+28.2%
+754.7%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | +0.3% | +2.6% | +2.8% |
| 7D | +8.7% | -5.5% | +14.3% | +9.4% |
| 30D | -14.1% | -4.9% | -9.1% | -13.7% |
| 3M | -41.2% | -41.7% | +0.6% | -38.5% |
| 6M | -39.2% | -55.2% | +16.0% | -35.6% |
| YTD | -41.3% | -61.1% | +19.8% | -36.8% |
| 1Y | -1.2% | -53.3% | +52.1% | +3.5% |
| All | +782.9% | +28.2% | +754.7% | +810.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling