+56.1%
OMFS vs VOO
+78.5%
-22.4%
-22.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -0.4% | +0.2% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +1.7% | +2.6% | -0.9% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +2.5% | -2.0% | +4.5% | +4.5% |
| 3M | -6.6% | -2.8% | -3.8% | -4.0% |
| 6M | +0.2% | +2.2% | -1.9% | -2.2% |
| YTD | +13.6% | +11.5% | +2.0% | +1.2% |
| 1Y | +18.9% | +13.5% | +5.4% | +4.0% |
| 3Y | +56.1% | +78.1% | -22.0% | -22.8% |
| All | +56.1% | +78.5% | -22.4% | -22.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling