+59.9%
OMC vs NIO
-36.7%
+96.6%
-43.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -1.6% | -0.9% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -6.4% | -13.0% | +6.6% | -5.7% |
| 30D | +1.1% | -18.3% | +19.4% | +2.2% |
| 3M | +10.4% | -33.2% | +43.6% | +12.8% |
| 6M | -1.7% | -21.5% | +19.8% | -0.8% |
| YTD | +4.4% | -25.5% | +29.9% | +5.6% |
| 1Y | +8.4% | -38.0% | +46.5% | +10.5% |
| 3Y | +14.4% | -65.5% | +79.8% | +17.4% |
| 5Y | +33.9% | -90.6% | +124.5% | +41.9% |
| All | +59.9% | -36.7% | +96.6% | +43.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling