+30.2%
OMC vs LNT
+31.4%
-1.2%
-33.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | 0.0% | -0.6% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -4.4% | -1.0% | -3.3% | -4.1% |
| 30D | -7.6% | -4.2% | -3.4% | -6.4% |
| 3M | +4.5% | -6.7% | +11.2% | +6.7% |
| 6M | -0.3% | -3.6% | +3.3% | +0.7% |
| YTD | -0.1% | +5.9% | -6.0% | -2.1% |
| 1Y | +4.6% | +7.3% | -2.6% | +2.2% |
| 3Y | +10.5% | +46.5% | -36.0% | -1.1% |
| All | +30.2% | +31.4% | -1.2% | +19.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling