+81.1%
OKTA vs UMAC
+129.0%
-48.0%
-33.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | -2.5% | -0.2% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -3.4% | +1.0% | -2.2% |
| 30D | +13.0% | -15.1% | +28.1% | +14.4% |
| 3M | +41.7% | -10.8% | +52.5% | +41.3% |
| 6M | +105.9% | +15.7% | +90.3% | +95.5% |
| YTD | +92.6% | +80.1% | +12.4% | +74.6% |
| 1Y | +81.1% | +116.7% | -35.7% | +65.3% |
| All | +81.1% | +129.0% | -48.0% | +65.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling