+151.3%
OKLO vs ZETA
+361.9%
-210.6%
-89.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | +7.6% | -4.5% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +16.9% | +18.8% | -1.8% | +11.3% |
| 30D | -19.7% | +12.6% | -32.3% | -22.3% |
| 3M | -45.0% | +29.5% | -74.5% | -49.1% |
| 6M | -66.9% | +128.6% | -195.5% | -74.3% |
| YTD | -64.0% | +85.5% | -149.4% | -70.4% |
| 1Y | -75.2% | +90.6% | -165.8% | -79.8% |
| All | +151.3% | +361.9% | -210.6% | +90.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling