+284.9%
OKLO vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+384.9%
-78.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.3% | -1.7% | -4.6% | -6.3% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -2.0% | +2.1% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -15.2% | -19.8% | +4.6% | -15.2% |
| 3M | -26.2% | -62.1% | +35.9% | -25.7% |
| 6M | -35.0% | -99.5% | +64.5% | -41.6% |
| YTD | -44.4% | -99.7% | +55.3% | -51.4% |
| 1Y | -45.9% | -99.9% | +54.0% | -54.3% |
| All | +284.9% | -100.0% | +384.9% | +226.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling