+249.6%
OKLO vs UMC
+261.2%
-11.6%
-79.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.2% | +2.4% | -11.5% | -10.1% |
| 7D | -12.2% | +9.0% | -21.2% | -15.1% |
| 30D | -19.7% | +17.2% | -37.0% | -24.6% |
| 3M | -37.4% | +11.4% | -48.8% | -41.3% |
| 6M | -42.3% | +137.5% | -179.8% | -59.8% |
| YTD | -49.5% | +193.1% | -242.6% | -69.5% |
| 1Y | -54.7% | +240.3% | -295.0% | -74.4% |
| 3Y | +249.6% | +262.2% | -12.6% | +94.9% |
| All | +249.6% | +261.2% | -11.6% | +94.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling