+284.9%
OKLO vs NVT
+178.0%
+107.0%
-78.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.3% | -2.1% | -4.2% | -4.2% |
| 7D | +0.1% | +2.0% | -1.9% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -15.2% | -7.2% | -8.0% | -9.6% |
| 3M | -26.2% | -0.9% | -25.3% | -27.9% |
| 6M | -35.0% | +42.6% | -77.6% | -57.5% |
| YTD | -44.4% | +52.9% | -97.3% | -66.3% |
| 1Y | -45.9% | +64.5% | -110.4% | -68.8% |
| All | +284.9% | +178.0% | +107.0% | +76.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling