+584.4%
OKLO vs MSTZ
-99.2%
+683.6%
-78.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | +5.5% | -7.2% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +7.7% | -23.6% | +31.3% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -4.3% | -60.7% | +56.4% | -19.5% |
| 3M | -24.6% | -58.3% | +33.6% | -31.1% |
| 6M | -31.1% | -60.0% | +28.9% | -31.8% |
| YTD | -40.7% | -75.2% | +34.5% | -40.2% |
| 1Y | -42.4% | -19.9% | -22.6% | -20.7% |
| All | +584.4% | -99.2% | +683.6% | +822.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling