+299.5%
OKLO vs FN
+158.4%
+141.1%
-78.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.6% | +3.1% | +0.5% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -1.7% | +4.5% | +3.8% |
| 30D | -4.0% | -22.0% | +18.0% | +7.5% |
| 3M | -36.9% | -43.0% | +6.1% | -17.6% |
| 6M | -37.1% | -27.7% | -9.4% | -30.0% |
| YTD | -42.5% | -10.5% | -32.0% | -45.0% |
| 1Y | -40.7% | +12.5% | -53.2% | -49.6% |
| All | +299.5% | +158.4% | +141.1% | +162.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling