+332.0%
OKLO vs FLNC
-69.8%
+401.8%
-78.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -8.3% | +6.6% | -0.1% |
| 7D | +7.7% | -4.2% | +11.9% | +8.5% |
| 30D | -4.3% | -20.0% | +15.7% | -0.1% |
| 3M | -24.6% | -56.9% | +32.2% | -12.3% |
| 6M | -31.1% | -35.5% | +4.4% | -28.0% |
| YTD | -40.7% | -48.8% | +8.2% | -35.9% |
| 1Y | -42.4% | +49.3% | -91.7% | -45.7% |
| 3Y | +310.9% | -61.8% | +372.7% | +313.5% |
| All | +332.0% | -69.8% | +401.8% | +336.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling