+151.3%
OKLO vs EPAM
-30.2%
+181.5%
-89.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | -0.8% | +3.9% | +3.2% |
| 7D | +16.9% | +18.5% | -1.6% | +13.5% |
| 30D | -19.7% | +44.0% | -63.8% | -25.0% |
| 3M | -45.0% | +63.0% | -108.0% | -50.1% |
| 6M | -66.9% | +67.3% | -134.2% | -70.5% |
| YTD | -64.0% | -20.5% | -43.4% | -60.8% |
| 1Y | -75.2% | -9.6% | -65.6% | -74.1% |
| All | +151.3% | -30.2% | +181.5% | +166.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling