+284.9%
OKLO vs EBAY
+152.6%
+132.3%
-78.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EBAY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.3% | +1.5% | -7.8% | -6.7% |
| 7D | +0.1% | -0.8% | +0.9% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -15.2% | -0.6% | -14.5% | -15.2% |
| 3M | -26.2% | -1.0% | -25.2% | -26.2% |
| 6M | -35.0% | +16.3% | -51.3% | -37.2% |
| YTD | -44.4% | +21.7% | -66.1% | -46.7% |
| 1Y | -45.9% | +16.5% | -62.4% | -47.9% |
| All | +284.9% | +152.6% | +132.3% | +225.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EBAY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EBAY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EBAY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EBAY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling