+299.5%
OKLO vs AMT
+8.2%
+291.3%
-78.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.6% | -1.1% | +4.7% | +3.3% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -0.2% | +3.0% | +2.8% |
| 30D | -4.0% | +4.6% | -8.6% | -2.8% |
| 3M | -36.9% | -8.4% | -28.4% | -37.8% |
| 6M | -37.1% | -6.0% | -31.1% | -38.0% |
| YTD | -42.5% | +2.1% | -44.6% | -41.4% |
| 1Y | -40.7% | -6.4% | -34.3% | -40.9% |
| All | +299.5% | +8.2% | +291.3% | +295.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling