-12.6%
ODFL vs NIO
-62.6%
+50.1%
-45.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.6% | +1.6% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -6.3% | -13.0% | +6.8% | -5.7% |
| 30D | -13.6% | -18.3% | +4.7% | -12.8% |
| 3M | -24.2% | -33.2% | +9.0% | -22.8% |
| 6M | -13.8% | -21.5% | +7.7% | -13.1% |
| YTD | +19.0% | -25.5% | +44.5% | +20.2% |
| 1Y | +25.7% | -38.0% | +63.7% | +28.0% |
| All | -12.6% | -62.6% | +50.1% | -7.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling