-14.8%
ODFL vs NIO
-59.9%
+45.1%
-45.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | +5.9% | -9.2% | -3.5% |
| 7D | -4.4% | +5.6% | -10.0% | -4.6% |
| 30D | -6.1% | -4.2% | -1.9% | -6.0% |
| 3M | -21.9% | -26.3% | +4.4% | -20.9% |
| 6M | -17.6% | -42.5% | +25.0% | -15.9% |
| YTD | +5.6% | -33.5% | +39.2% | +7.0% |
| 1Y | +20.5% | -52.7% | +73.2% | +24.0% |
| 3Y | -14.8% | -57.5% | +42.7% | -10.8% |
| All | -14.8% | -59.9% | +45.1% | -10.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling