+177.4%
NXT vs ZBRA
+12.6%
+164.8%
-48.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZBRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +1.5% | -0.3% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -1.1% | +1.8% | -2.9% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -15.3% | -1.7% | -13.6% | -14.8% |
| 3M | -43.8% | +47.8% | -91.6% | -51.8% |
| 6M | -18.7% | +56.7% | -75.4% | -32.1% |
| YTD | -3.0% | +49.4% | -52.4% | -18.4% |
| 1Y | +22.7% | +16.5% | +6.2% | +12.6% |
| 3Y | +95.9% | +31.5% | +64.5% | +59.5% |
| All | +177.4% | +12.6% | +164.8% | +137.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZBRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZBRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZBRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZBRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling