-23.8%
NXT vs SCHG
+16.2%
-40.0%
-47.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | -0.7% | -2.9% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -0.9% | +0.7% | +1.3% |
| 30D | -20.0% | -2.3% | -17.7% | -16.5% |
| 3M | -30.9% | +4.5% | -35.5% | -35.5% |
| 6M | -23.8% | +13.6% | -37.4% | -34.0% |
| All | -23.8% | +16.2% | -40.0% | -34.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling