+180.5%
NXT vs QID
-82.2%
+262.7%
-48.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | QID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +0.3% | +0.8% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -2.7% | +5.6% | +1.4% |
| 30D | -17.2% | +1.8% | -19.0% | -16.2% |
| 3M | -32.0% | -2.2% | -29.8% | -30.4% |
| 6M | -15.8% | -32.1% | +16.4% | -25.3% |
| YTD | -1.9% | -28.6% | +26.7% | -10.3% |
| 1Y | +22.5% | -36.3% | +58.8% | +8.8% |
| 3Y | +100.5% | -74.4% | +174.9% | +30.0% |
| All | +180.5% | -82.2% | +262.7% | +58.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside QID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus QID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × QID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded QID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling