+177.4%
NXT vs LSCC
+39.3%
+138.1%
-48.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +2.0% | -0.8% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -1.1% | +1.3% | -2.4% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -15.3% | -9.7% | -5.7% | -12.4% |
| 3M | -43.8% | -23.7% | -20.1% | -38.5% |
| 6M | -18.7% | +26.5% | -45.1% | -24.5% |
| YTD | -3.0% | +57.5% | -60.5% | -16.0% |
| 1Y | +22.7% | +75.7% | -53.0% | +2.5% |
| 3Y | +95.9% | +19.5% | +76.5% | +71.3% |
| All | +177.4% | +39.3% | +138.1% | +131.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling