+100.5%
NXT vs EAT
+612.9%
-512.3%
-48.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -3.4% | +4.5% | +1.9% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -4.9% | +7.8% | +4.1% |
| 30D | -17.2% | -1.2% | -16.0% | -17.4% |
| 3M | -32.0% | +52.2% | -84.2% | -40.0% |
| 6M | -15.8% | +65.0% | -80.8% | -28.1% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +55.0% | -56.9% | -14.6% |
| 1Y | +22.5% | +42.1% | -19.6% | +9.5% |
| 3Y | +100.5% | +614.7% | -514.2% | -15.8% |
| All | +100.5% | +612.9% | -512.3% | -15.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling