+192.7%
NXT vs EAT
+483.7%
-291.0%
-51.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | +2.9% | -2.1% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -5.7% | -8.9% | +3.2% | -3.6% |
| 30D | +18.5% | +3.4% | +15.1% | +17.5% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -9.3% | +5.2% | -2.6% |
| 6M | -20.3% | +43.8% | -64.1% | -29.5% |
| YTD | +15.5% | +39.9% | -24.4% | +2.6% |
| 1Y | -5.0% | +89.7% | -94.7% | -23.2% |
| All | +192.7% | +483.7% | -291.0% | +10.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling