+226.9%
NXT vs DECK
+25.3%
+201.6%
-51.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.7% | -1.5% | -5.1% | -6.3% |
| 7D | +24.7% | +6.0% | +18.7% | +23.4% |
| 30D | +13.0% | +7.4% | +5.6% | +11.5% |
| 3M | -0.2% | -11.7% | +11.4% | +2.0% |
| 6M | -19.3% | -11.0% | -8.3% | -18.0% |
| YTD | +14.3% | -15.4% | +29.7% | +16.8% |
| 1Y | -11.0% | +7.2% | -18.2% | -13.6% |
| 3Y | +167.8% | -11.8% | +179.6% | +164.9% |
| All | +226.9% | +25.3% | +201.6% | +178.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling