+177.4%
NXT vs DECK
+22.6%
+154.8%
-48.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +1.6% | -0.4% | +0.9% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -2.2% | +1.1% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -15.3% | -13.6% | -1.7% | -13.0% |
| 3M | -43.8% | -21.2% | -22.5% | -41.4% |
| 6M | -18.7% | -21.1% | +2.4% | -15.4% |
| YTD | -3.0% | -17.2% | +14.2% | -0.4% |
| 1Y | +22.7% | -30.7% | +53.5% | +30.3% |
| 3Y | +95.9% | -3.4% | +99.3% | +96.0% |
| All | +177.4% | +22.6% | +154.8% | +137.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling