+182.4%
NXT vs ARMK
+91.9%
+90.4%
-51.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.3% | +4.5% | +0.9% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +32.2% | -2.6% | +34.9% | +33.1% |
| 30D | +21.9% | -5.2% | +27.1% | +23.7% |
| 3M | +6.6% | -6.5% | +13.1% | +8.6% |
| 6M | -16.8% | +15.3% | -32.1% | -19.7% |
| YTD | +20.4% | +43.6% | -23.2% | +10.3% |
| 1Y | -1.5% | +42.1% | -43.6% | -9.6% |
| 3Y | +182.4% | +94.0% | +88.4% | +152.6% |
| All | +182.4% | +91.9% | +90.4% | +152.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling