-18.7%
NXT vs ALHC
-27.0%
+8.4%
-47.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -0.6% | -0.5% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -15.3% | -1.0% | -14.3% | -15.4% |
| 3M | -43.8% | -10.2% | -33.6% | -42.1% |
| 6M | -18.7% | -28.3% | +9.6% | -18.0% |
| All | -18.7% | -27.0% | +8.4% | -18.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling