+49.2%
NXPI vs ZTS
-48.8%
+98.1%
-46.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | +0.2% | +1.8% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -0.6% | +0.2% | -0.2% |
| 30D | +15.0% | +11.0% | +4.0% | +11.9% |
| 3M | +12.6% | +10.9% | +1.6% | +9.3% |
| 6M | -10.6% | +0.9% | -11.5% | -11.2% |
| YTD | +22.1% | -33.0% | +55.1% | +39.8% |
| 1Y | +29.8% | -29.6% | +59.4% | +44.8% |
| All | +49.2% | -48.8% | +98.1% | +82.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling