+42.9%
NVTS vs FROG
+205.7%
-162.8%
-80.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.3% | -3.3% | +9.6% | +7.4% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -11.3% | +14.0% | +6.9% |
| 30D | -4.5% | +3.6% | -8.1% | -6.0% |
| 3M | -61.5% | +1.7% | -63.2% | -61.9% |
| 6M | +28.0% | +123.5% | -95.5% | -4.1% |
| YTD | +65.3% | +40.2% | +25.0% | +40.2% |
| 1Y | +113.0% | +81.0% | +32.0% | +62.7% |
| All | +42.9% | +205.7% | -162.8% | -23.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling