+187.5%
NVT vs VICR
+209.3%
-21.7%
-46.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VICR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | +11.2% | -6.5% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +4.1% | +5.0% | -0.9% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -5.1% | -12.5% | +7.3% | -2.1% |
| 3M | -1.2% | -33.6% | +32.4% | +7.8% |
| 6M | +46.6% | +10.7% | +35.9% | +38.2% |
| YTD | +60.0% | +80.6% | -20.6% | +34.2% |
| 1Y | +70.8% | +288.4% | -217.6% | +17.6% |
| 3Y | +187.5% | +213.8% | -26.2% | +99.8% |
| All | +187.5% | +209.3% | -21.7% | +99.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VICR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VICR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VICR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VICR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling