+113.1%
NVT vs PLTD
-77.2%
+190.3%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +0.4% | -2.9% | -2.4% |
| 7D | +7.0% | -0.9% | +7.9% | +6.8% |
| 30D | -2.3% | +1.3% | -3.7% | -1.9% |
| 3M | -3.1% | -32.9% | +29.8% | -9.5% |
| 6M | +47.0% | -24.9% | +71.9% | +43.1% |
| YTD | +56.2% | -18.2% | +74.5% | +57.3% |
| 1Y | +74.5% | -28.7% | +103.2% | +71.8% |
| All | +113.1% | -77.2% | +190.3% | +57.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling