+180.7%
NVT vs LCID
-92.8%
+273.5%
-46.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -7.8% | +5.3% | -1.7% |
| 7D | +7.0% | -9.3% | +16.3% | +8.0% |
| 30D | -2.3% | -35.4% | +33.1% | +1.8% |
| 3M | -3.1% | -17.1% | +14.0% | -3.5% |
| 6M | +47.0% | -58.9% | +106.0% | +58.3% |
| YTD | +56.2% | -59.6% | +115.8% | +67.6% |
| 1Y | +74.5% | -78.0% | +152.5% | +99.2% |
| All | +180.7% | -92.8% | +273.5% | +245.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling